ScalES-PPM: Issueshttps://swprojects.dkrz.de/redmine/https://swprojects.dkrz.de/redmine/redmine/favicon.ico?17095821032020-08-13T16:32:33ZDKRZ projects
Redmine Bug #348 (Closed): Incorrect with-regard-for-quality testhttps://swprojects.dkrz.de/redmine/issues/3482020-08-13T16:32:33ZMatthew Krupcale
<p>When configuring using the option <code>--without-regard-for-quality</code> or <code>--with-regard-for-quality=no</code>, the <em>action-if-given</em> test will always fail, resulting in the configuration always setting <code>with_regard_for_quality=yes</code>. This is a problem for (build) environments without networking for which <code>mpirun</code> will fail.</p>
<p>The attached patch fixes this.</p> Bug #343 (Closed): ACX_FORTRAN_RUN_CHECK_SIZEOF in acx_fc_real_size.m4 does not check size of its...https://swprojects.dkrz.de/redmine/issues/3432017-09-25T16:29:03ZMatthew Krupcale
<p>The function <code>ACX_FORTRAN_RUN_CHECK_SIZEOF</code> in <code>m4/acx_fc_real_size.m4</code> does not actually check for the size of the real type passed as its argument, similar to the analogous function <code>_ACX_FORTRAN_CHECK_SIZEOF_INTEGRAL_TYPE_RUN</code> in <code>m4/acx_fc_integer_size.m4</code> for integer types.</p>
<p>Furthermore, when using this function, the bits division arithmetic,</p>
<p><code>AS_VAR_SET([acx_fortran_Sizeof],[`expr ]AS_VAR_GET([acx_fortran_Sizeof])[ / $acx_cv_c_char_bits`])]</code></p>
<p>was returning some shell errors stating that <code>expr</code> was missing an operator, and that <code>/</code> is a directory. This seems to be due to the multiple nests of <code>eval</code> which come with <code>AS_VAR_SET</code> and <code>AS_VAR_GET</code>. It was easier to just do what was intended using the specifically designed method <code>AS_VAR_ARITH</code>, rather than using the more general <code>AS_VAR_SET</code> with <code>expr</code>.</p>
<p>The attached patch fixes these two issues.</p> Bug #299 (Closed): Fix array passing in C/Fortran interface files from P*TYPE* to *TYPE*Vhttps://swprojects.dkrz.de/redmine/issues/2992012-02-10T12:03:21ZThomas Jahnsjahns@dkrz.de
<p>Some routines pass arrays incorrectly from Fortran to C. This does currently yield correct results for all compilers tested, i.e. is not an acute problem, but should be fixed for clarity of semantics.</p> Bug #284 (Closed): Fix MPI_Comm_f2c testhttps://swprojects.dkrz.de/redmine/issues/2842011-09-19T12:53:03ZThomas Jahnsjahns@dkrz.de
<p>The test does not account for MPI_Comm_f2c implemented as macro, i.e. mpi.h is not included.</p> Bug #261 (Closed): Check wether make dist-check workshttps://swprojects.dkrz.de/redmine/issues/2612011-03-24T16:25:28ZThomas Jahnsjahns@dkrz.deBug #19 (Closed): extent representation naminghttps://swprojects.dkrz.de/redmine/issues/192010-02-09T15:18:21ZThomas Jahnsjahns@dkrz.de
<p>rename extent member 'offset' to 'lower_bound'</p>